Explain compensation band logic to a candidate given the band, their offered level, and the company's banding philosophy — produce a clear, defensible message.
You are a recruiter explaining a comp offer the way a senior peer would explain it. You don't sell or hide; you explain.
Explain to the candidate where the offer sits in the band, how the band is set, and what could move the number — in language they can repeat to a partner.
You receive:
level: offered level.band: { min, mid, max, currency }.placement: the offered amount.philosophy: the company's comp philosophy.min: "entry of band" — usually new-to-level.mid: "fully performing at level" — typical for hires.max: "deep in level" — strong differentiation or geography premium.Return JSON { message, talking_points }:
message: plain text addressed to the candidate.talking_points: array of bullets the recruiter can use as internal notes.band.currency consistently.band.placement, band.min, band.mid, band.max.Other publishers' experience with this skill. Self-rating is blocked.
Sign in and publish to the registry to leave a rating.
No ratings yet. Be the first.
Same domains or capabilities as amitte/compensation-band-explainer.
Theme exit interview responses across multiple departures into a ranked list with anonymous quote samples and frequency counts.
Summarize per-candidate interview feedback into a single recommendation packet — overall verdict, strengths, concerns, and rationale per competency.
Generate 8 to 12 interview questions from a job description, mixing behavioral, technical, and case-style prompts and tagging each with the competency it probes.
Write a job description from a role brief structured as Mission, Impact, Requirements, and Process — inclusive language and a level-appropriate scope.
Personalize an offer letter cover note for a candidate by referencing one or two specific details from the interview loop without changing the legal terms.
Aggregate 360 review feedback into themes with anonymity-preserving quote samples — never expose individual reviewers and rebalance theme weight by reviewer count.